In the name of Allah, the Merciful to all, the Compassionate

In recent days I wrote a few articles about Charlie Hebdo attack and why it’s quite safe to conclude that it was a false flag. Moreover I brought some links from other sites, in the News List section. In this article I want to look at this incident from another point of view.

Charlie Hebdo attack was a Psy-Op, tragic enough to drive people crazy to stampede in streets, united under one flag and one slogan, defending values they hold most dear.

Wait a minute: The problem is they have no idea what those values are.

The Science of Deduction Shows They Put a Spell on You

By: Jay

In the wake of the latest school shooting the question of “Why?” haunts most people.  A multitude of responses are given in the mainstream media by pundits and analysts, ranging from violent video games, films, to psychotropic drugs, to gun control, and on and on.  None of these people understand what these events are in the bigger picture.  All of the proposed “answers” as to the cause of such events are merely peripheral aspects that are relevant, but fail to give an adequate explanation to the entire phenomenon.  Analysts rarely mention past shooters and the patterns that emerge between them and the present shooting.

By: Jay

Already numerous patterns I listed in my initial analysis, as well as others consonant with false flags, have made themselves apparent in the Paris shooting and hostage incidents. Also apparent are the predictable results that follow these events. We have seen all of the following:

In the name of Allah, the Merciful to all, the Compassionate

The attack on the Paris-based satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo on Wednesday, January 7, was a very well-planned commando style one. That's how a witness explained it: "I think they were extremely well-trained, and they knew exactly down to the centimeter and even to the second what they had to do."

But nowadays, it's really hard not to leave any fingerprints behind.

In the name of Allah, the Merciful to all, the Compassionate

On Wednesday, three heavily armed masked men attacked the Paris-based satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo. Known for lampooning Islam, other religions and political figures. The incident took place in broad daylight; killing 12, wounding eight others.

Let's put answering the question of "Who is the culprit?" aside for now. We may never be able to find a convincing answer for such a question. All we hear, is a few names of suspects with some IDs left in a getaway car, who get killed in a shootout with police and are not able to defend themselves in a court of law; the same repeating scenario of any terrorist attack, like Boston marathon bombing, Sydney hostage taking, etc.

Source: RT, Pepe Escobar

A pro-style jihadist commando attack in Europe’s heart. Cui bono?

Careful planning and preparation, Kalashnikovs, rocket-propelled grenade launcher, balaclavas, sand-colored ammunition vest stuffed with spare magazines, army boots, easy escape in a black Citroen…

And the icing on this particularly lethal cake: faultless Paris-based logistical support to pull it all off. A former top French military commander, Frédéric Gallois, has stressed the perfect application of “urban guerrilla technique” (where are those notorious Western counter-terrorism “experts” when one needs them?)

Cui bono, then, killing Charlie? Only those whose agenda is to demonize Islam.

Not even a bunch of brainwashed fanatics would pull off the Charlie carnage to show people who accuse them of being barbarians that they are, in fact, barbarians. French intel at least has concluded that this was no underwear bomber stunt. This was a pro job that happened to take place just a few days after France recognized Palestinian statehood. And just a few days after General Hollande demanded the lifting of sanctions against the Russian “threat.”

Source: Paul Craig Roberts

There are two ways to look at the alleged terrorist attack on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo:

One is that in the English speaking world, or much of it, the satire would have been regarded as “hate speech,” and the satirists arrested. But in France Muslims are excluded from the privileged category, took offense at the satire, and retaliated.

Muslims don’t need to be apologetic for the crimes committed by others. We just need to inform people that Islamism, or political Islam, or whatever you may name it, is not the only possible culprit.

People need to ask themselves Cui Bono?

it can be simply any of these scenarios:

Source: 21stcenturywire.com

A new year brings resolutions, and for the establishment, the resolutions are quite clear: more of the same. More false flags, more media circus and staged news, ad infinitum, ad nauseam.

In summary, we find that Euro terror, and in particular, terror events involving in some tangential way connected to France bear all the same patterns and Atlanticist black-op power bloc operations that have been at work since the Cold War and Gladio. As new details emerge, a clearer picture can be painted about the new siege, but I feel confident we can expect all the same villains and cast of characters that come to play in the vaudeville variety show that is the global war on terror. The strategy of tension plan of the neocon establishment has long argued for a “clash of civilizations”between the “Judeo-Christian” nations and Islamic civilization to destabilize and remake the Middle East on the long march to the British Fabian great game of global technocratic government.

Source: 21stcenturywire.com

“Journalists from Charlie Hebdo reportedly gather in their Paris office for their weekly editorial meeting. A Charlie Hebdo reporter told the French newspaper Le Monde that the attackers had to have been informed that the editorial meeting was taking place, otherwise there are not many people on the premises.” Who would have had access to inform the shooters about the editorial meetings?